I was reading an article and while most of the information in it is fine, do I dare say “Good,” there was some information that was absolute crap and it is EASY to prove wrong. Case in point.
If you simply launch with only one episode on your first day, and someone subscribes to your podcast, then you only get one download. BUT, if you launch with five episodes and they subscribe, then you get five downloads, which will help to raise your rankings within iTunes.
THIS IS NOT TRUE. Depending on what app, the app’s configuration you may get zero downloads. In most cases you have to manually go in and download them
New & Noteworthy is your goal for the first eight weeks — being featured is only attainable once, so you need to make those first eight weeks count.
Not true. Multiple shows (especially TV show that come and go with the seasons) go in and and out of New and Noteworthy.
Another strategy to keep in mind when reaching out to other podcasts is to ask if they would be open to exchanging honest ratings and reviews.
People think they can get away with this by throwing in the word “honest.” OK, I’m going to honestly kick you in the shin. Does tat make it OK. If you’re audience is not motivate to leave you a review, instead of asking strangers why not look at yourself (or better yet, your audience ) and ask them WHY they won’t review you.
The iTunes algorithm works off of downloads, ratings, and reviews.
Nobody official knows the secret sauce, but to not even include subscribers, in my opinion, almost voids this whole article.
if you can get 50 you will be well on your way to ranking in the top of iTunes
Nope. My Because of my Podcast had over 60 great reviews. It’s not about rating and reviews. It’s about subscribers
Big name guests will help grow your audience
While it sounds good, “Big Name Guests” rarely take the time to promote your show. It’s not the size of the guest that brings value. It’s the value that makes the guest “Big.”
Yes, you should try to maximize your launch and get people talking about it. Shouldn’t you be doing that on episode 138 as well?
If you want to start podcasting and avoid the headaches and get strategies and worksheets to help you create content that will get people talking about your show, join the School of Podcasting
I was at Podcamp Pittsburgh last weekend. They had a speaker cancel at the last minute, so I went into a room and 20 minutes later I came out to deliver a presentation on How to Grow Your Podcast Audience.
In the talk I talk about:
Making sure your show doesn’t turn people off
The importance of headlines
Edit is not a four letter word
Step by step guide to growing your audience
Things that don’t work.
Live Q &A (My apologies I didn’t always repeat the question)
So I’m going to attempt to tell this story by just using facts. To provide full disclosure, I was nominated in the Education category and lost. The weird thing is I didn’t lose to Grammar Girl. That is what I expected as – let’s face it – when you’re an answer on the TV show Jeopardy!, you’re probably going to beat my little podcast about podcasting. So here are some facts.
Todd Cochrane (the man behind the podcast awards) had attempted to sell the awards to the New Media Expo. While the New Media expo controlled them last year, due to other circumstances the control of the awards was returned to Todd.
The Podcast Awards show website was out of date. That is why Todd Cochrane launched a Gofund me campaign to redo the site. He is looking for $25,000 to redo the site. When you host a site that has voting on it, it is not your typical website. There is lots of extra security and tools needed to attempt to keep out people who would game the system (cheat). I once had a website (battlingbands.com) where there was almost no prize, and people would cheat like crazy. I went through probably 5-7 scripts before I shut down the site.
Two more facts: I’m a Brian Ibbot fan, as I’ve known him since the very first podcasting event in Ontario California. I’m also a big Todd Cochrane fan as we also go “way back.”
The Podcast Awards:
“The People’s Choice Podcast Awards is designed to allow fans to show their appreciation by nominating their favorite shows. Then through a peer / listener review process of the top 25 nominated shows, a slate of 10 podcast for each category is determined. Daily voting for a 2-week period is designed to show engagement and allow show of all sizes to compete for a Podcast Award. Through listener engagement the true power of podcast audience ultimately determine the annual winners.
The 11th Annual that will recognize the best podcasters in the world by allowing the people (Listeners and Podcasters) to nominate, and then vote for their favorite podcast.”
For the nomination process, ” The nomination page can only be filled in once. IP and Email tracking is in place along with other anti-cheating mechanisms. Each nomination will be verified by email which will require a confirmation by web based url.” According the rules, “Voting will last for 15 days, and listeners can vote once a day.”
The Diamond Club Plan
The Diamond Club (featuring a picture of Brian Ibbot) has a reddit group. They got together and voted on who they would vote for as a group (if you wanted to).
Peoples Choice -No Agenda
Arts – The Beerists
Business -The Bizarre Briefing
Education -Scam School
Entertainment -We Have Concerns
Games & Hobbies -The Angry Chicken
GLBT -Diary of a Trans Woman
Government & Organizations -Politics Politics Politics
Kids & Family -Hypothetical Help
Music – Joe and Meg’s Musical Adventure
News & Politics – No Agenda
Science & Medicine – Weird Things
Society – Culture – The Phileas Club
Sports & Recreation -Mat Men
Technology – Hak5
TV & Film -Cordkillers
If you had any issues you could contact @HatTheSystem which is a twitter account with Brian Ibbot’s face across the top header. The purpose of the twitter account was to remind people to vote.
According to this website (and per Brian on his show The Morning Stream) this is the second year they’ve use this tool. The first year they were 7/7 for the shows they supported.
This year they were 14/17 shows (82%). According to Brian, he had nothing to do with the technology. It was created by a listener. He did acknowledge that his face is all over the branding of the tools. Here is the episode where Scott and Brian talk about the awards ceremony
So What Did They Do?
They made a Bookmarklet. What is a bookmarklet?
“a small software application stored as a bookmark in a web browser, which typically allows a user to interact with the currently loaded web page in some way.” – wikipedia.
In this case it made it easier to vote for their selected shows. It didn’t automatically populate anything. It didn’t submit the vote. All it did was help point out who to vote for, and type in the voter’s email address for them.
Then they trained their community how to use it
Is It Cheating?
If you have a contest that involves getting something off a top shelf, and someone comes in with a step stool, is it cheating?
Did the rules say you’re not allowed to bring in a step stool? No? Then I guess it’s not cheating.
Even if everybody else was going to do it without standing on any kind of stool.
It reminds me a bit of performance enhancing drugs in sports. If it’s not illegal, then it’s not cheating and you better take these drugs if you want to compete (even if they shrink your testicles).
There seemed to be a “It’s not how you play the game, it is if you win or lose” vibe when I listened to the Morning Stream this morning. Oops, I’m getting away from facts and mixing in opinion.
In the end, each of the votes had to be confirmed by a person. If you used the tool and wanted to deviate from the default settings you could. It was all voluntary.
Sure, they made it easier to start your voting process, but they still needed to be confirmed via email to make them count.
It’s About an Engaged Audience
If the goal of the podcast awards was to see who had the most engaged audience, then here again the Diamond Club wins. I know my audience didn’t offer to build a tool to make it easier to vote. I didn’t setup a special twitter account for those who wanted reminders to vote. You can’t argue that they have the most engaged audience.
I am Confused By the Motive
On one hand, the Diamond Club seems to despise the awards. They thought they were stupid. In one chat room I saw:
+ArtgineerKAPT_Kipper, eh, you’d have to prove the podcasts award are relevant in the first place lol when I looked at his Twitter feed I saw this:
That leads me to believe they did this to bring the awards down.
If the awards suck, then why go through so much trouble to win one?
What is the point of winning 82% of the awards to pee all over them?
That doesn’t make much sense to me.
You will see the comments in the video below as they watched the presentation were not kind.
Podcast Awards Hatting the System Version
Quick Reactions Are Often Not the Best
The first response from the Awards upon hearing about the bookmarlet was “Cheated Exposed during awards ceremony. We are going to proceed with an Investigation. An Illegal Off-site voting system apparently was used.” Later this was changed to a message that explained that a bookmarklet had been used, and that this makes a show more educated in a specific field (bookmarklets), but not a better show. Later another update to the podcast awards stated, “If some feel an apology on out negative reaction to this tool so be it we apologize. This tool will invoke significant change though, if the awards survive. ”
Whack the Mole
As someone who has lived through the hell of the podcast awards (I helped Rick Calvert when they were part of the New Media Expo), my hat goes off to Todd Cochrane as this is A TON of work. I’m sure Todd will come up with some new rules, people will complain, some will say its fixed, and the cycle will repeat. The next year, Todd will adjust the rules, someone will find a loop hole, people will complain, some will say its fixed, and well, I guess that is our society.
Would I blame Todd if he quit putting in the effort? No. Would I be sad? Yes. The Awards are like that Annoying Uncle at the picnic. He is kind of annoying (the voting process), but picnics would be so different without him. It is cool when you see “little independent” podacasters occasionally take down a giant corporate team.
Is the Diamond club filled creative geniuses, or did they overstep the bounds of fair play? The goal was to get your audience to vote for you. They did. They made it easier. They announced it on twitter, showed what they were going to do on YouTube (via an unlisted video – so you could share it, but it wasn’t 100% public.). Here again we are walking a fine line of what “Secret” means.
Every wonder why you should start a podcast? Well I’m here to help you answer that question. I have a segment on my School of Podcasting show where my audience explains the opportunities they have had come their way because of their podcast. Here is a quick playlist
If you want to help me get into the Magical Land of Unicorns and Fairy dust known as New and Noteworthy (I would seriously like to bump up the charts to see exactly what the effect is – which I think is nothing but won’t know until I’m up the charts). So please Subscribe, Rate and Review, the show Here
Are you stoked? Are you ready to stay up till 4 AM to prove you’re serious? Are you ready to sacrifice your spouse and kids to show that you’re a real entrepreneur? Well then you’re an idiot. Check out this video.
I at one point listened to the Fizzle show, but quit cause there was too much “yuck yuck” for me. But this video makes me want to give them another chance.
You want some motivation? You want to work hard and pull yourself up by your bootstraps? You want to get up before everyone else and hustle early in the morning and late into the night? You want to earn? You want to burn the midnight oil and kill it out there?
Fine. But be SMART about it. Here’s 3 reasons why unbridled hustle is hurting us all.